John 17: But Jesus Prayed for Unity (Sermon)


John 12: 20-23
“My prayer is not for them alone [meaning the disciples]. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one— 23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me."


“I don’t know if you’re blowing my mind, or stretching my mind. Is that happening? Is that possible?”

 I heard these words spoken 6 days ago by a pastor in one of the larger non-denominational, charismatic churches in Madison. We were on retreat together with as part of the Missio cohort with a denominationally and racially diverse group of area pastors. His comment was had come in response to something which Kerri Parker had said. Kerri is the executive director of the Wisconsin Council of Churches and she’s a collaborator with UDTS on the Awaken Dane grant. She had been describing to the group the kinds of partnerships that already exist between some churches and denominations in which they share clergy and recognize one another’s baptism. And this pastor was visibly bewildered, his expression oscillating between incredulity and epiphany. 

 “Is that happening? Is that possible?” … 

 Our remarkable text for this sermon comes from what is known as Jesus’ ‘high priestly prayer’ which comes at the end of the longest block of Jesus’ words in the gospel of John, his farewell discourse. 

In our text, we are invited to overhear Jesus’ prayers in the final moments before he is arrested. In these final words, Jesus prays for those who will believe in him through the message of the disciples. For those who would read and receive John’s gospel, both its first audience and on down through the millenia all the way to us. Uniquely in Scripture, here we encounter Jesus praying for us, revealing to us a prayer that reverberates within the Triune life, a prayer that transcends time, echoing across the generations to meet our ears today, and to grant to our hearts a full measure of joy and hope. 

 And what is it that Jesus prays for us? 

 I pray…that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. Jesus prays for unity in later generations of Christian believers. It may help us to understand what to make of this prayer, to know something of what it meant for John’s first audience to hear it. 

According to Raymond Brown this prayer would have had a pretty specific meaning for John’s community. He suggests that they would hear this prayer as one for unity between what had become, at this point, some decades after the Ascension, two distinct Christian communities: the Johannine community who came to believe through the witness of John, and the Petrine community, who came to believe through the message of Peter and the other apostles, reflected in the Synoptics. 

 What separated these two groups of Christians? Brown notes some subtle but important differences, both in terms of Christology and ecclesiology. Both held a high Christology, but where we see in Matthew and Luke affirm that Jesus’ birth was miraculous and that he had no human father, and ascriptions to Jesus as King, Lord and Savior, what we don't see in those gospels, but which is pronounced in the gospel of John, is a Jesus who says, “Before Abraham even came into existence, I AM.” The Johannine community uniquely emphasized the pre-existence of Jesus as the eternal Word. This is something we see clearly in John 1: “In the Beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” It is also repeated elsewhere in the prayer here in John 17. In vs. 5 he prays, “So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had in your presence before the world existed.” So John’s community believes it sees something more clearly about who Jesus is than the Petrine community. 

 According to Brown, they also likely differed from the Petrine Christians who were moving toward more defined ecclesiastical offices and polity—while Johannine Christians emphasized that all Christians were first and foremost disciples, each with the Spirit – an view that tends to call into question moves toward hierarchy. Additionally, whereas the Petrine Christians emphasized the importance of holding onto the Apostle’s teaching without change, the Johannine community stressed that the Holy Spirit is a teacher who keeps teaching the disciples, and will guide them into all truth, addressing matters that the disciples could not yet bear while Jesus was still with them, according to John 16. 

 To oversimplify, the Petrine Christians were more committed to tradition whereas the Johannine Christians were more open to new things the Spirit might have to teach them. 

My point in spelling out these differences between early Christian communities is not to question their common confession of Jesus as Lord, Savior and Son of God. But, instead, to help us recognize that the differences between Christians in view in John 17, were real and substantial: they touched on important matters of Christology, and on practical ecclesiastical and polity concerns, as well as on matters of what the Spirit was saying to the church in real time. The differences were real, and they were not unlike those we experience today. 

But Jesus prayed for unity. -

A partner in ministry of mine in Madison, Jon Anderson, leads an organization he founded a few years ago called Collaboration Project. Their mission is to foster collaboration between churches the good of the city. He and I have been working closely together for a few years now. A couple weeks ago, he shared with a group of pastors a dilemma his organization is facing. While they’ve really gained a lot of traction, and built connections with a wide spectrum of the Protestant churches, including engagement with something like 110 different churches: from evangelicals and charismatics to mainline churches, Lutheran, episcopal, UCC, presbyterian. But they’re beginning to encounter increased pressure to draw lines around who can partner with them and who can’t. And that pressure is coming from multiple directions. Some of the churches are pushing for a clear biblical statement of faith. Others have refused be involved so long as there are non-LGBTQ affirming churches or funders in the mix. The differences are real, deeply felt and painful. 

So what are we to make of Jesus’ prayer for unity? 

John’s vision was for there to be a clear and compelling contrast between the world and the Jesus community, that they would stand out because of the way they loved one another, because of their uncommon unity. 

It’s a beautiful and inspiring vision. But precious few of our local churches look anything like this. In fact, in large part the folks in the pews on Sundays’ have already sorted themselves out into what we blithely call ‘likeminded’ churches. Recent research has suggested that people increasingly choose their churches based on the dominant politics and social attitudes, rather than based on its theology. Politicization around COVID-19 has exacerbated this, such that a good number of people have left churches because they didn’t like the mask and social distancing policy, one way or the other. 

But Jesus prayed for our unity. 

 Pastors often preach this passage in order to call for unity in their congregation. While, of course, unity in the local church is a good and godly thing, unity for the local church is not what John envisions that Jesus is praying for here. Here Jesus was praying for unity between two groups of Christians who had differences on Christology and polity and different convictions about whether it was more important to stick to the tradition or listen for the fresh words of the Spirit. 

 Jesus prayed for our unity. But what can that mean? It’s hard for us to fathom. One person of the Trinity petitions to another person of the Trinity on our behalf!? The eternally begotten Son asks the Father to make us one, as they are one? Jesus prayed for our unity. Do you think the Father heard that prayer?

 Of course. What this means is that within the Triune life, there’s a conversation happening about the unity of the church. A swirl of petitioning and a desiring and a working toward unity among those who know Jesus. 

What do you suppose Jesus is doing about that desire for unity, now that he sits glorified at the Father’s right hand? What would it look like if Trinity was already answering Jesus’ prayer in the places where we live? In my classes I often stress the importance of discerning what God is up to in order to be able to join God in that. 

In Jesus’ prayer, we get a pretty good idea of something we ought to watch for God to be doing. If Jesus prayed for Christian unity, you better believe that it is something the Trinity is actively working toward. 

And not just in some vague future-tense. You may be tempted to think of unity merely in eschatological terms. As if unity will be a nice conclusion to the story, but it’s one that really has no major role in the plot because it is simply impossible before Jesus sorts out who is right and wrong on a number of important questions. But if unity were only a possibility in the eschaton, what sense would it make for Jesus to indicate that unity among believers was meant to bear witness to the world? 

No, clearly Jesus’ prayer and John’s vision was for a more immediate and genuinely possible form of unity. 

Jesus prays not for an invisible, mystical, future unity, but for a visible, tangible, present one. 

When John’s community hears Jesus praying for them to be united with the Petrine community, that’s not a far-off wish. That’s a actual possibility, and one that calls for a certain posture and set of actions. 

To be clear, the unity Jesus prays for is not something that we can muster. The sad fact is we can’t just all get along, at least in any way that will be uniquely beautiful and compelling to the watching world. Unity is a matter for prayer, because it’s ultimately something only God can do. But, and this is good news, it is something God can do. More than that, friends, it is something our Triune God is doing right now, for those that have eyes to see it. 

“I’ve never been a part of a group like this,” said one of the other fellows participating in our Missio Madison retreat last week. She was a lay pastor who had served as an interim for several UCC and United Methodist congregations in and around Madison. When she said it, the room was full of nods from others who could say the same thing. During the retreat, we took turns sharing stories about how we’d experienced God. We’d heard little testimonies from a conservative Baptist leading a couple house churches, a charismatic Latina in a bi-lingual congregation, an older African American man leading recovery ministry in a non-denominational church, a younger African American guy leading a progressive Presbyterian campus ministry, a white female ELCA associate pastor who started a food truck ministry, a white female arts pastor in a large mostly white charismatic church, and a white woman connected to the largest church in Madison who did consulting with non-profits. 

Later, one of the women shared that although the stories were really different than her own experiences and came from different traditions, she was able to resonate with at least one part of each person’s testimony. These are relationships that the Spirit is knitting together through kinship in Christ and partnership in the gospel in a geographical area, and they’re glimpses of the Trinity answering Jesus’ prayer. 

 In addition to anecdotes like these, I’m convinced there are seismic shifts happening that are paving the way for uncommon unity among believers. Let me quickly call four to your attention. 

One is the shifting religious demographics of the nation which are making the old divisions upon which denominations defined themselves in opposition to one another increasingly irrelevant in the light of the greater contrast between all people of genuine Christian faith and the rest of the population which is increasingly secular and into self-help spiritualities. 

A second shift paving the way to unity is how the practical crises facing many of our denominations and churches—financial pressures, old building and empty pulpits--are turning us toward one another out of necessity for support, cooperation, collaboration and sharing. 

 hird, is the profound sense I’ve heard from numerous people that God is softening up hearts, stoking curiosity and generousity and forgiveness. Turning us toward one another with a fresh willingness to know one another as we truly are, and to discover together whether the church might actually, by the miraculous work of God, provide a refuge from the virulent polarization that has enveloped our society. 

Finally, as a result of these and other factors, there have been over the last decade and a half the emergence of dozens of new networks of churches, organizations like Collaboration Project, in cities across the nation that are blowing fresh wind into ecumenism through opportunities to unite in service to the community. 

Jesus prayed for our unity and the Father heard that prayer, and now Jesus is seated at the right hand of the Father, and has sent the Spirit to empower us to join in God’s answer to this prayer. 

So what might it look like for us to be involved in the Triune campaign for unity among believers in Jesus? 

First and foremost, and this is no small thing: We join Jesus’ prayer. Mission is, by definition, joining God’s action and here we see that God’s action is praying for unity. So praying for unity among believers in your place is a form of mission. We’ll all have an opportunity to do precisely this in just a moment. 

Second, you can take a small step toward relationship with those across denominational lines in your local setting. Invite them for coffee or a meal. Ask about their families and their hobbies, not just their church. Share with them some of your story and how you’ve come to know and love Jesus. Now, your Presbytery or your District Superintendent might not agree, but my advice is to invest at least as much time into relationships with the other pastors in your immediate area as you do in your Presbytery or District. Why? Well, for one reason, unity in a Presbytery or a Conference isn’t going to raise one single eyebrow. But unity between the 5 churches in town, or the 4 churches in your urban neighborhood who don’t look or vote the same, now that’s something to wonder about. Unity in the local setting makes a powerful Christian witness. 

Third, and finally, once some trust and respect and kinship has developed, look for ways to make common cause together in serving your community. In Madison, Collaboration Project is helping to coordinate an annual weekend of service that invites dozens of churches to serve their local school or park or non-profit alongside folks from other churches – and concluding with a time of celebration. In my work in Madison, it’s been increasingly clear how many pastors and Christians are ready for a new season of ecumenical friendship and collaboration across the old divides. They want to be able to say: “I’ve never been part of a group like this.” 

Maybe you do, too. Igniting that desire is a work of God’s Spirit. 

“Is that happening, is that possible?” 

Well, Jesus prayed for it, so you better believe it.

Charge: Put your Hope in God

It was my honor to give the charge to our graduating seminary students this year. 
I pray that it encourages you, too.




 

UpWords Podcast Interview

 It was a treat to sit down with John Terrill, Executive Director of Upper House in Madison, a friend and collaborator, for this conversation.

What I'm up to in Madison, Wisconsin

"What are you doing in Madison?"

I get this question often these days. I've been engaging in the Dane County / Madison context since 2017 and it's been a great joy to see God open up exciting opportunities for ministry there. If you're interested in learning more, here are links to three distinct but related initiatives. 

 

 

The Dane Churches Project (Research Study)



 

 

 

Missio Madison (8 month cohort for missional practioners)

 

 

 

 

 

Awaken Dane (2 year cohort for pastors & congregations)

Book Reviews of Church Planting in Post-Christian Soil: Theology and Practice by Christopher James

Nothing makes an author more grateful than to have his or her work read and engaged critically. So it is a real honor that Church Planting in Post-Christian Soil has been reviewed by a dozen different journals. Check out what these reviewers had to say!  

 

International Bulletin of Mission Research | Volume 42 no 1 178-9

"One of the top ten outstanding books of 2017 for mission studies."

Ecclesiology: The Journal for Ministry, Mission and Unity | Volume 14 no 3 2018, p 352-354.

"Those applauding the book are themselves leading lights in the field of practical ecclesiology, and we know that we can therefore expect a study that is theologically astute, as well as empirically grounded. James’ book does not disappoint." --Martyn Percy

 

Englewood Review of Books | May 2018

"The strength of his work lies in his synthesis of work across different fields. He writes, “Church is a diverse, complex, and simultaneously sociocultural and theological reality. Expressing this reality can be done only by exceeding genre boundaries and integrating them as a spectrum of multidiscplinary perspectives” (11). That insight enables him to actively engage with actual church communities in a variety of ways while applying ecclesiological thinking to his data." --Justin Cober-Lake

 

Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society | Volume 61 no 2 Jun 2018, p 423-427

"...an exempla­ry case study in the performance and application of practical ecclesiology." --D. Alan Blanc


Homiletic: The Journal of the Academy of Homiletics | Volume 43 no 2 2018, p 54-55.

"Overall, this book is well-conceived and executed. It deserves careful attention for classrooms, churches, and theological libraries." --Nelson Cowan

 

Missiology: An International Review | Volume 47 no 1 Jan 2019, p 89

"Engagingly written and well researched, this volume is an important contribution to the literature on church planting in the West. What makes it stand apart from most texts on church planting is its solid grounding in empirical research...
Church planters serving in the Global North, as well as those involved in their preparation, training, and oversight, should carefully study this book. It would make an excellent resource for a church-planting community of practice or for an advanced class on church planting in the West. The author’s weaving together of sociological and ecclesiological insights to describe and evaluate current models and offer proposals for church planting in a post-Christian context is exemplary." --Richard Hibbert

 

Dialog: A Journal of Theology | Volume 59 no 1 Spring 2020, p 43-45

"The book offers both practical wisdom for church planters in various contexts and methodological guidance for theologians working at the intersection of theology and social science...James’s careful social science work in service of a practical ecclesiology adds weight and nuance to such conversations. For denominational decision-makers, scholars of mission and church planting, pastors, and church planters in cities like Seattle, James’s research and conclusions will be valuable and generative." --Scott Hagley 

 

Theological Studies: A Journal of Academic Theology | Volume 80 no 2 Jun 2019, p 475-477

"...important contributions to several academic fields, including ethnography, sociology of religion, congregational studies, missiology, evangelism, ecclesiology, and practical theology. This book should appeal not only to academics but to all who are concerned with the health and vitality of the Church in a changing North America.

 Witness: Journal of the Association for Evangelism in Theological Education | Volume 33 (2019)

"Church planters, as well as ecclesial leaders responsible for nurturing church planting movements, who believe that engaging an increasingly post-Christian U.S. is vital to missional faithfulness will find this book incredibly insightful and informative." --Jack Johnson

Istina | Volume 64 no 3 Jul - Sep 2019, p 411-412 (in French) 

I don't read French -- so I have no idea what they said about my book. :)


Practical Theology | Volume 13 no 1 - no 2 Mar 2020, p 185-187

"breaks new ground...a great book, not just a good one." --Nigel Rooms


Ecclesial Futures | Volume 1 Issue 2 

"James's chapter on missional theological assessment was particular engaging, exploring the nature of the church itself starting with an overview of missional theology and its implications for each of the four models." --Kristine Stache

 

You can pick up a copy here.

Missio Madison: Cohort for Missional Practioners


I'm excited to announce this project that has been in the works for more than a year! 

Missio Madison is an incubator and cohort for local missional practioners. We exist to provide a community in which followers of Jesus can collaboratively exegete Madison and discern God's call into fresh forms of Christian community and mission.  Launching in January 2020, the Missio Madison cohort will gather monthly on the fourth Friday (noon-4pm) through April for training and conversation. Participants will also meet monthly with a coach and two other participants to lean in to their growing edges. In addition, the cohort will experience an overnight retreat for spiritual renewal and discernment (March 23-24, 2020).

Missio Madison participants will:
  • cultivate sustaining friendships among peers in local ministry and mission
  • build relationships with coaches and context experts
  • discover fresh practices of prayer and dwelling in scripture
  • form habits of deep engagement in and reflection on Madison as a mission context
  • encounter a range of missional models and examples to fuel creativity and innovation
  • foster an ecclesial environment of ecumenical friendship and partnership
  • identify and develop the skills needed for leading new missional initiatives

Missio Madison is made possible by the generous support of the Lilly Endowment and is an initiative of University of Dubuque Theological Seminary.
Applications for the 2020 Spring beta cohort are due November 22, 2019. 


My Book: Church Planting in Post-Christian Soil: Theology and Practice

National headlines regularly herald the decline of Christianity in the United States, citing historically low levels of confidence in organized religion, drops in church attendance, church closures, and the dramatic rise of the "Nones." Scarcely heard are stories from the thousands of new churches and new forms of church that are springing up each year across the country. In this book, Christopher James attends carefully to stories of ecclesial innovation taking place in Seattle, Washington-a city on the leading edge of trends shaping the nation as a whole. James's study of the new churches founded in this "post-Christian" city offers both theological reflection and pragmatic advice. After an in-depth survey- and -interview-based analysis of the different models of church-planting he encountered, James identifies five threads of practical wisdom: 1) embracing local identity and mission, 2) cultivating embodied, experiential, everyday spirituality, 3) engaging community life as means of witness and formation, 4) prioritizing hospitality as a cornerstone practice, and 5) discovering ecclesial vitality in a diverse ecclesial ecology. Stimulating, encouraging, and stereotype-shattering, this book invites readers to reconsider the narrative that portrays these first decades of the twenty-first century as a period of ecclesial death and decline, and to view our time instead as a hope-filled season of ecclesial renewal and rebirth.

Available here and here.

Interview on the RePlacing Church Podcast

While I was out in Seattle, I had a chance to sit down with Ben Katt, host of the RePlacing Church Podcast.  We talked about my research on new churches in Seattle with a special focus on neighborhood expressions of church.

How do we practice the core conviction that God is here?
If you can’t find out what God is doing on your block, what makes you think you’re going to figure out what God is doing in the city?
Enjoy!


Joining God, Remaking Church, Changing the World by Alan Roxburgh (Review)

Alan Roxburgh has been writing books about how the church can respond to the massive cultural change afoot for two decades. His latest offering, Joining God, Remaking Church, Changing the World: The New Shape of the Church in Our Time, culls together the wisdom of his experience as a consultant in a highly accessible, slim volume.

Roxburgh offers a penetrating analysis of the "misdirecting narratives" that lead to dead-ends, as well as a series of practice guides to help the church reconnect with it's core conviction, that the Triune God is alive and active in the world, in their city, on their very block. 

Here in Dubuque, Iowa we've been using Joining God in the formation of a new missional community. The "ordinary people of God" that make up this fledgling group have remarked at the fundamental hopefulness of Roxburgh's vision ("places of unraveling [are a] prelude to God shaping a new future for God's people") and have been intrigued by the notion that "God is out ahead of us" and that our core task is to discern what God's up to. The temptation to leverage our expert strategies to "fix the church" hasn't disappeared--not by a long shot--but a growing imagination for joining God in the renewal of all things is beginning to displace this deep-seated default, and that's genuine good news.

Above all, Roxburgh's gift to the church in this moment is a practical resource for guiding the people of God into postures and practices of faith in the God who is once again leading the children of Abraham and Sarah into an unknown land.

The images below are photos around our local context--Dubuque, IA. All quotes are taken from Joining God.
 



'Some Fell on Good Soil': Church Planting in Religious Ecologies

In the midst of the decline of mainline denominations and the rise of the “nones” in the U.S. something surprising is happening.[i] Church planting is booming.  According to Ed Stetzer and Dave Travis, the number of new churches started annually jumped from approximately 1500 in the late 1900s to 4000 by 2006.[ii]  Such a spike is not only the greatest surge in church planting in the last century but Warren Bird claims it has yielded such a flurry of planting that the number of churches opened annually has outpaced church closures—a much more discussed and visible reality.[iii]  This rising phenomenon calls for sociological study, not only to describe and explain its occurrence, but also to understand the factors influencing the vitality of these new congregations.

I have contributed to this needed area of study by seeking to bring insights from organizational and religious ecology perspectives to understanding the influences upon the vitality of new congregations and their networks.  An organizational ecology approach “focuses on the influences of the characteristics of organizations and of the demography and ecology of the populations in which they operate.” [iv]  Thus it explores not only the impact of internal factors such as the church’s attributes, but also of external ones, such as the existence and characteristics of other churches.  Animating this study, then, is the question: What are the most relevant ecological factors impacting the vitality of new congregations and church planting initiatives in the U.S.? 

In the final section, I employ the most relevant theories toward an analysis of Churches for the Sake of Others (C4SO), a new church planting initiative on the West Coast of the United States.  Based on the factors identified as pertinent to new congregations generally, I highlight some of the features of C4SO that promise to be either liabilities or assets.


My article, originally published in Witness: Journal of the Academy for Evangelism in Theological Education, v. 27 is available in its entirety here.

________________________________

[i] Mark Chaves, “All Creatures Great and Small: Megachurches in Context,” Review of Religious Research, 47(4) (2006), 329-346; Michael Hout and Claude Fischer, “Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations,” American Sociological Review, 67(2)(2002), 165-190.
[ii] Ed Stetzer and Dave Travis, “Who Starts New Churches?: State of Church Planting USA” (Leadership Network, 2011), 2.
[iii] Warren Bird, Warren, “More Churches Opened Than Closed in 2006,” Rev Magazine (August 2007), 68.
[iv] Michael Hannan, “Ecologies of Organizations: Diversity and Identity,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1) (2005), 54.

D. Moody Smith’s The Theology of the Gospel of John (Book Review)

D. Moody Smith’s The Theology of the Gospel of John is a topical, but unquestionably scholarly, survey of Johannine theology.

A brief summary of the content will set the stage for the more detailed review to follow.  Smith begins, in the Introduction, by stating the most obvious, but interesting of John’s uniqueness, “John more than any of the other Gospel writers deals with theological matters.”[1]  That is, John while maintaining narrative form, includes a fair amount of theologizing; the kind of stuff more familiar to epistles.  Issues of authorship and origin are treated only briefly enough to assert they are not central to the aim of this book. What is central is the understanding that John makes us “witness to a critical stage in the relationship between Christianity and Judaism.”[2]  What was once one entity, is now in the early stages of clear distinction.  In closing, Smith prepares his readers with his perspective that given this crucial moment, nearly all the themes of John ought to be considered in this light.  In addition, other New Testament thought will be considered, for contrast and for continuity.

An Advent Reflection on Luke 1:26-38 | The Annunciation

May 21st, 2011. Cataclysmic earthquakes rocked the globe, loved ones everywhere suddenly disappeared, unmanned cars and planes wreaking havoc, massive devastation, death, and destruction, riots and panic in every major city. It was the end of the world. Or, at least, it was supposed to be. So said Harold Camping, and his followers. With 5 million dollars worth of advertising, they plastered billboards and RVs across the country, announcing the definitive date of the impending Judgment Day, May 21st, 2011.

I listened to the media coverage of all this with great interest, not, of course, because I believed Camping’s prediction, but because I wanted to hear more about the people who did. Many of them had left their respectable jobs and blown their life savings in order to join the campaign to spread the “good news” of the end of the world. But especially, I wanted to understand what it was like for these people to believe with such certainty that God was going to show up in an undeniable, powerful way, and then to have that hope evaporate when, the next morning, the sun rises, and it is just another day. What do you do on May 22nd?

Hold that thought and take a look at Luke 1:26-38.
26 In the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, 27 to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. 28 The angel went to her and said, “Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.”

29 Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. 30 But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. 31 You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus. 32 He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, 33 and he will reign over Jacob’s descendants forever; his kingdom will never end.”

34 “How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?”

35 The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. 36 Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be unable to conceive is in her sixth month. 37 For no word from God will ever fail.”
38 “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.” Then the angel left her.
The Christians that Luke is writing his gospel to are stuck in a moment, a May 22nd moment. These are second generation Gentile Christians converted and living in an environment full of apocalyptic predictions, full of anticipation about the end of the world. And they were part of it, they had once been sure they were going to live to see the end, Christ coming in power to reign on the earth.

As Luke writes his gospel, he puts the basis for their hopes right out there. Gabriel declares that Mary’s son
will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over Jacob’s descendants forever; his kingdom will never end.”
These words are unmistakable echoes of the what the prophets of Israel had foretold: a political messiah who would throw off the oppressive empire, lead Israel back to global prominence, and the whole earth would look to Jerusalem from which God would at long last bring peace to the earth.

But for the Christians to whom Luke was writing, these promises must have rung hollow. After all, it was May 22nd. The Son of Mary had come and gone. Sure, he’d resurrected and ascended, and Pentecost had come, and the gospel had spread across the Roman world. But all that had happened more than two decades ago, and still, these glorious promises were unfulfilled.

Jesus hadn’t returned to sit on David’s throne. While, Jewish zealots had temporarily taken back Jerusalem from Roman rule, the result in AD 70 was the utter destruction of the temple which was supposed to be the seat of Christ’s coming kingdom. These revolutionaries had been brutally crushed and Roman empire was as powerful and exacting as ever. Besides, the Jewish people had rejected Jesus as the messiah. Leaving the church as nothing more than collection of small bands of bedraggled believers, bracing themselves against the Emperor’s demands of full allegiance and enduring opposition from the Jewish faith that gave them birth.

This reality was a far cry from the vision which compelled the first Gentile believers. Leaving them anxious, confused, and aimless. Too many times they had admonished themselves to be patient, finally they were caving into the nagging sense that all hope of reigning with Christ in an earthly kingdom had faded long ago. What now? What do you when May 22nd comes and the kingdom doesn’t?

These are the anxious questions circling around the community for which Luke writes.

And yet, as I sat with this text, and considered these questions, my own anxieties began to come to the surface:

Denominations are in decline; the Nones are on the rise.

Seminary enrollment is down, and seminary graduates struggle to get jobs.

Churches are being sold and converted into apartment buildings and furniture stores.

So-called successful churches are racked by scandal and reek of corporate culture and crass marketing strategies.

The church suffers from schism and compromise within and ridicule and dismissal without.

Congregations are graying.

Ask young people what they think about Christianity and the words that come to mind are judgmental, hypocritical, intolerant.

1500 years in the Western halls of power, and this is what we have to show for it?
The time of our influence is quickly fading. What now?

What are we to do as the kingdom of Christendom slips away?

When we first encounter Mary in our text, we find her in an anxious state, too:

“Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be.”

Luke’s purpose in this text is to invite his readers, past and present, to join Mary on the journey she makes from this place of anxiety. In this text, we watch Mary as she moves from anxiety, to attention, and finally, to availability. And Luke invites us, too, to move from anxiety, to attention, to availability.

Mary begins in anxiety – “deeply troubled,” wondering “what can this mean?”

Gabriel’s words to her are reassuring: “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God.” And he proceeds to announce that she will conceive, and bear a son that will rule in David’s throne forever.

Mary’s response to Gabriel signals that she has made a transition from anxiety to a new posture of attention:
“How will this be,” she says, “since I am a virgin?”
We might imagine that Mary is incredulous: So, Gabriel, I don’t know about heaven, if they have sex education in angel elementary school—but let me tell you a little something about what we humans call “the birds and the bees...”

But when Mary asks “How will this be, since I am a virgin?” she is not doubting Gabriel as Zechariah had several verses earlier; instead, she is humbly acknowledging her own inability to make this happen—while turning her attention back to God. How will God do this? How will this be?

Luke wants his anxious readers to make a similar move from anxiety to attention, and in order help them do this, he puts Mary’s anxious thoughts immediately alongside the great source of anxiety for his readers, the eschatological promises that Christ will sit on David’s throne and his kingdom will never end.

Luke’s audience had once been sure they were going to live to see this, but every morning the sun rose, and it was just another day, and each passing day was one more reason to doubt that God would ever fulfill these promises. What now?

Luke’s readers resonate with Mary’s anxiety, but they can also resonate with her humble self-assessment. Just as Mary is unable to conceive on her own, Luke’s readers feel powerless to bring about the realization of these eschatological promises. We’re just a few Christians scattered here and there. The Romans think we’re seditious and the Jews think we’re heretics. We’re really in no position to make these promises come true. We’re in no position to build this kingdom.

Moving from this place of anxiety, Luke invites them to wonder with Mary, “How will this be?” To turn their attention away from their circumstances, to give up their preconceived notions of what it will look like when the kingdom comes, and to turn their attention to God…How might God do this? What might this look like? Maybe it’s happening right now, where might we see it…HOW will this be?

We, too, are invited to move from anxiety to attention with similar questions. Our institutions and influence may be in decline, but where might the kingdom be breaking in? What might this look like? Where might we see it? How will this be?

This question is a game changer: How will this be?

When Mary asks it, Gabriel’s answer reveals much about how the kingdom comes:

The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. 36 Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be unable to conceive is in her sixth month. 37 For no word from God will ever fail.
The words are so familiar and so poetic, it is easy to miss their significance. This is a story about getting pregnant…but its not one of those stories! Nothing like the dramatic mythical tales of the Greek gods coming down to spend a night of passion with the beautiful women of earth.

This will be subtle. Like a shadow. Like a breeze.

When the incarnation began in the womb of Mary, I’m not sure she even noticed.

Conception is like that. For most of human history, it has been impossible to confirm that it has even happened until weeks after the fact, when the mother begins to experience its affects – tiredness, hunger, morning sickness, and later, a growing belly, and, in my wife’s case, swollen ankles!

This is why pregnancy tests are a $220 million dollar industry in the US. It is why we’ve developed advanced, early-detection, first-response, sure-predict pregnancy tests, all because it’s hard to tell.

Conception is like that, and the kingdom coming is like that, too, suggests Luke. One day the kingdom will come in its fullness, and it will not be subtle, but until then, we must to learn to pay attention.

This is why it is so important to dwell with that question, “How will this be?”

It is because of this faithful question that Mary is given a sign of the in-breaking of the kingdom.
“Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be unable to conceive is in her sixth month,” says Gabriel.
Nothing earth-shattering. No cataclysm. No army of angels descending from heaven. But this is not just another day. Something is definitely afoot. Maybe today isn’t May 22nd after all.

The same is true in our day. As we move from anxiety to attention, we too, begin to see signs of the subtle in-breaking of the kingdom…

Catch a glimpse in the new Churches and fresh expressions popping across the western world, like the SimpleWay, a new monastic community in Philadelphia incarnating the kingdom in the backwaters of Empire, or like WildGoose Uprising: a Presbyterian church formed out of the bluegrass culture of rural Appalachia;

Catch a glimpse as historic churches are drawing on the best of their traditions, contextualizing the gospel in new ways; like Beer and Hymns: a Christian Church in Portland, OR that revives the old fashioned hymn sing and puts those bar-tunes back in their original settings; like Community Dinners: a 90-year old church Pentecostal that moved out of its building and into community centers across the city of Seattle where it hosts agape feasts as dinner churches 5 nights a week.

Young people committing to lives of radical discipleship and witness among their peers, and rediscovering ancient Christian practices like the catechumenate and lectio divina.

Mature elders, determined to pass on their legacy and wisdom, modeling time-earned trust in the faithfulness of God.

Renewed interest in Christian social engagement: Christians caring for creation, combating human trafficking, reflecting on the arts, rediscovering vocation in the workplace, leaving behind political ambitions and simply caring for those in need with no strings attached.

And the signs of the inbreaking kingdom aren’t just in the church, the kingdom is breaking through in the wider culture as well:

Young people moving beyond cynicism, eagerly looking for ways to serve.

Impassioned voices calling out for gender pay equality and livable wages.

Consciousness about climate change translating into changing life-habits and development of forms of renewable energy.

Most recently, growing popular consciousness and discourse about of the ways we allow technology to draw us out of real relationships and presence…

Nothing earth-shattering. No cataclysm. But something is afoot in our day. Our institutions may be in decline, but the kingdom is on the move. In the twilight of Christendom, something new is dawning. And if we pay attention, we’ll start to see it.

Mary's posture of attention leads her ultimately to a declaration of availability. In response to Gabriel’s assurance, and the sign of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, she announces her willingness to participate in this surprising work of God.
“I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.”
This posture of availability is ultimately where Luke wants to lead his readers.

Being available for the Lord’s work, however, does not mean joining a campaign to build the kingdom. It’s not about signing up to fight for a resurgence of Christendom. That is not how the kingdom comes, and that is not what the Lord’s servants are invited to. Indeed, when Jesus spoke of the Kingdom of God, he never implored anyone to build it or to extend it. Instead, he invited people to enter the kingdom, and to receive it as a gift.

This is precisely what we see Mary doing: “I am the Lord’s servant. May your word to me be fulfilled. Let it be. I receive the gift. God, do what your kingdom thing. I’m available to participate.”

The kingdom does come through human partnership, but it is not an equal partnership. As Lukan commentator Joel Green states:
“Although Mary’s role is crucial, the initiative and powerful work of God are much more so. Ultimately the purpose of Mary’s question [and Gabriel’s answer in this text] is to emphasize that all of this is God’s doing!”
All of this is God’s doing. This is important for us to take to heart, especially those of us who are passionate about being “missional.” For many, the call to be missional comes through as an appeal for Christians to muster their strength and to get to work, to get out there and bless the world, to fight for justice, to help the poor, to share the gospel. All good things, of course, but sometimes in our eagerness to serve the kingdom, we rush out ahead of God and find ourselves lacking the empowerment needed for the work.

This response, while zealous, is not what Mary models for us. In her journey from anxiety, to attention, and finally to availability, she invites us to recognize that this mission is all God’s doing, to trust that God will do it and in that humility to learn to pay attention and make ourselves available to participate in the surprising work of God.


My daughter Ginny is five; she’s about three feet tall with dirty blond hair and a sweet and spunky personality. During Advent two years ago, we brought out the Nativity set like we do each year. Except this was the first year she really began to get into it.

She had a blast playing with these Little People characters. Some of the scenes she created with them were, shall we say, nontraditional. OK, they were probably mildly heretical; I’m pretty sure I overheard the angel putting Jesus in a time-out.

A couple nights each week for her bedtime story we’d sit down together with all the characters and act out the traditional Christmas story, with the angel, and Elizabeth, and the shepherds and the wise men and Mary and Joseph.

Well, a few weeks of this and finally it was Christmas eve. We turned off the lights, plugged in the Christmas tree, had our annual fondue dinner and before we opened presents we asked Ginny if she’d like to pray. To our surprise, she did want to say something. And these are the words she said.

God is strong. 
God is patient. 
God does surprising things. 
And then you find Jesus lying in a manger.

My wife and I looked at each other and I said proudly, “Pretty good theology for a three-year old.” She smiled and shot back, “Or a 33-year old.” So, lately, whenever I feel the pull into anxiety over the state of the church, I think of Ginny’s simple prayer, and I let it remind me: Pay attention, Chris—God is strong. God is also patient. God does surprising things. Then you find Jesus…lying in a manger.

And that is how the kingdom comes.